30 Days of Books #4

Your favorite book or series.

One Hundred Years of Solitude, by Gabriel Garcia-Marquez

“What’s your favorite book?” is a question that any serious reader dreads. What is meant by “favorite”? Most moving? Emotional? Funny? Entertaining? Informative? God knows “favorite” doesn’t mean “best” because there are are plenty of books I love that are kind of crap. Like how I can ignore bad spelling in fanfiction if the Doctor and Rose are having an emotional reunion that totally makes me cry and OMG I need Doctor Who rehab.

If you’ve read this blog for any length of time (if you haven’t: This is totally a thing), you know that I am obsessed with One Hundred Years of Solitude. Like so obsessed that I was wondering whether or not I should ever talk about it again, in case there’s someone who actually cares about this site and thinks, “My GOD. Will she ever shut up about this book. I get it. It’s good. Close your damn mouth, woman.”

Yeah. Caffeine. Sorry.

But recently the literary world got the very sad news that Garcia Marquez has been diagnosed with dementia and, according to his brother, has stopped writing. So in honor of that great man, I’m going to drag out his magnum opus one last time, and say just how damn much I love this book.

The boring bit is that its about the rise and fall of a town in the middle of a Mesoamerican jungle. Its a beautiful book, like poetry that doesn’t make you crazy. It’s magical and funny and sad. I think everyone ought to set aside a week or two and just enjoy this book. Its a story to languish in. Just pick it up. Just give it a shot.

That’s all.   

Great Author Talks Shit (literally)

Dear Gabriel Garcia-Marquez (and other authors),

Sir, I greatly respect your books. Love them, in fact. But why on earth, may I ask, do you feel the need to include a scene of urination in every single one of your books? Is it some sort of metaphor for masculinity? Or is peeing just a way more meaningful act when you’re writing about it in Spanish?

I’m trying to get through Love in the Time of Cholera–for some reason I always preferred the magical realism ones–and around 30 pages in I hit a scene where a man convinces his wife that older men pee like a “fountain” to disguise the fact that his aim is crappy now. This discussion of his habits continues for two paragraphs, ending in the strange acknowledgement that now he sits down to pee.

And yes, I realize that a writer such as myself (whose only publishing credits thus far are an honorable mention and a poem in a teen magazine some years back) probably should not be criticizing a Nobel-winning author whose books answer Big Questions. But does almost every book have to have this?

Let’s take my favorite, One Hundred Years of Solitude (and yes, I know I talk about this book all the time. Just go read it already). The character I absolutely adored was Colonel Aureliano Buendia. He was fascinating and wonderful. And he died while peeing on a tree.

Seriously?

While we’re on the topic of bodily functions, let’s switch to Jonathan Franzen, author of the much-lauded Freedom. Sir, I was going along with your book. I actually found it delightful (that word everyone uses when you want to say enjoyable while also feeling Literary). But then there’s that scene where Joey goes through his own excrement–for like three freaking pages–and yes, while I understand the meaning of it: EEW! What on earth were you thinking when you wrote this? Obviously you had to edit it multiple times, possibly even considering the true experience of shit, which is not a cognitive path I wish to follow you down.

I don’t know what it is with lit-fic authors and topics people don’t really like to discuss. What happened to murder and incest? Can we go back to that, instead of talking about farting? Maybe its par for the course–these authors are (I guess) trying to make us confront out cultural idiosyncrasies. But it still grosses me out.

Steampunk, Cowboys, Vampires, and Nobel Laureates (Oh My!)

Totally gonna be my new cosplay costume

It’s been awhile since I’ve talked about what I’m reading on this supposedly book-based blog. So that’s what we’re doing today!

Mostly, I haven’t been talking about books because up until a week or two ago I wasn’t reading books. Anyone who’s ever found themselves smack-up against the end of a school year knows that its downright crazy to try to do anything but desperately try to keep up.

But last week things slowed down and so I got  a chance to dive back into my lovely, lovely words. I started out with The Best Science Fiction and Fantasy of the Year, Vol. 5 and edited by Jonathan Strahan. This was a great book. Sometimes these year’s best anthologies are a mixed bag, but I raced through this one. Libba Bray’s “The Last Ride of the Glory Girls” was an absolutely fabulous sci-fi Western (don’t ask me to compare it to Firefly–I haven’t gotten to watching that yet. I know. I’m sorry) and the first of her short stories I’ve encountered. The book starts out, interestingly enough, with two stories about bees, both of which are gorgeously written. And the first has both Sherlock Holmes AND Neil Gaiman, so really what could have gone wrong? There was a definite magical realism-trend this year, which was a nice switch from the hard sci-fi that’s dominated for awhile.

See? There's an automaton on the cover!

And speaking of soft sci-fi, I also finished The Falling Machine by Andrew Mayer. Its a mash-up of two of my favorite things–steampunk and superheroes–and was a fantastic popcorn adventure book. Better yet, it’s the first in a trilogy (aka The Society of Steam) and the second book is already out. It was a lot of fun to read and I’ve got the next one on hold at the library.

I also went to a library a few towns over and got a two-foot-tall stack of graphic novels (no, really) which means that I caught up on some series I have sadly fallen behind on. Namely, I read the rest of Astro City, actually started the first two volumes of American Vampire and was super impressed by the lack of Twilight-ness and splattering of gore, and I found The Legion of Super-Heroes: Teenage Revolution, which is the first six issues of the “Threeboot” Legion continuity (if you’re not a nerd, don’t ask) but more importantly was written by Mark Waid. And I have never met a Mark Waid-written comic that I didn’t like. So as they say in California, I was like totally psyched.

Finally, I got Love in the Time of Cholera by Gabriel Garcia-Marquez from the library, because I need to maintain my reputation as a high intellectual (ha). Also, I decided that I’m going to read all of Garcia-Marquez’s (major) works. I mean, I love the guy. But so far I’ve only finished One Hundred Years of SolitudeChronicle of a Death Foretold, Memories of My Melancholy Whores, and a smattering of short stories. But there’s dozens of other works. I’d resisted Love for awhile because it was for one an Oprah Book Club pick (ugh) and not magical realism, which are the works of Garcia-Marquez’s that I like best. But now that I’m into it I like it. Over the next couple months I want to read the other major works, like Autumn of the Patriarch and The General in his Labyrinth. Maybe also his nonfiction work, News of a Kidnapping.

In summation: Go read some books! (and comics. They deserve more love)

Stupid Literary Fiction

I know how she feels.

The following is a conversation I had with my mother about In Zanesville, a literary fiction novel by Jo Ann Beard that I quite enjoyed.

MOM: What’s that book about?

ME: Two girls growing up in the 1970′s. I really liked it.

MOM: Oh, what do they do?

ME: Well…lots of things. They get in a fight and the one’s dad is depressed and they basically just grow up.

MOM: So in the end they make up again?

ME: Well sort of.

MOM: So what problem do they have to solve? What’s the plot? Does the dad get better?

ME: Um…no, he doesn’t, and the plot is just them growing up. That’s it.

MOM: Um…right…you go with that.

This is what you do to me, literary fiction. Could you please create one book that doesn’t sound crazy to describe? As anyone who tries to sum up One Hundred Years of Solitude knows, eventually all you’re doing is babbling.

And while we’re at it, dear Lit-Fic, would it kill you to give me an ending once in awhile? Yes, I know that In Zanesville had one, but what about the three I read before it that just broke off. Call me uncultured all you want, but I enjoy an emotional climax and conclusion, thank you very much.

I believe in books’ ability to be meaningful and beautiful. Despite science fiction being my favorite genre, most of the books that have stuck with me have been literary fiction. A Tree Grows in Brooklyn. One Hundred Years of Solitude. The Age of Innocence. The list goes on and on.

And you know what? None of these books needed overmuch ambiguity or a “make-you-think” ending to pull me in. Yes, they made me think, but it wasn’t a trick. It didn’t made me angry. They didn’t need three different points of view and inverted typography to be inventive and meaningful.

I want my good books.

It’s Our Fault Classics are Boring

Classics aren’t supposed to be boring. That’s why they’re classics–because generations of readers have enjoyed them. Well, except for Le Morte d’Arthur. But I’m pretty sure that book just sucks. How many times can “horsed” be used per page?

And yet, English class is invariably voted “most boring” by a completely unscientific poll of high schoolers.

Partly, I think it there’s this idea that classics should be like vitamins–good for you, but not something you take without a grimace. And this attitude (however wrong) ha influenced the way we treat, teach, and talk about literature.

Take The Great Gatsby for example. It’s a sexy, tragic novel, and so to showcase this brilliant piece of literature, we give it a cover like this:

Sexy.

I work in a library, and so I get to hear a lot of frustrated parents griping about how all their thirteen-year-olds will read is Diary of a Wimpy Kid. And is it any surprise? No matter how many cutesy storybooks kids are read about not judging a book by it’s cover, they still do it. Why not give The Great Gatsby something better–like maybe a photographic cover, with a gorgeous blond woman (Daisy) in a gold dress (symbolism, see?) draped across a loveseat. How much more appealing is that? Heck–why does Lolita have a boring-ass cover? That book, at least, should bring the boys running.

The Great Gatsby is one of the first books a kid will read in high school. And usually, its introduced as “Great American Literature” or “The Novel About the American Dream.” Why don’t we teach books so that kids want to read them? Why isn’t Gatsby introduced as “A love triangle destroys a rich man in this decadent novel”? Then, after they’re hooked, we can get into the gold dress and the spectacles and the crumbling of the American Dream.

An even deeper question–why do we teach the books we teach? Surely today’s teenage girls will identify far more with The Age of Innocence or A Tree Grows in Brooklyn than Jane Eyre or Sense and Sensibility.

Kids need to read. Kids need to understand why these books are classics, why they are brilliant, why they must continue to be shared.

Boring literature teaches nothing.

**************************************

Day 26 of 30, 317 words.

Edith Wharton, You Kill Me

Why do they give classics boring-ass covers?

So today I finished reading The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton, and if there is anything more embarrassing than nearly crying in the middle of class. The girl next to me actually looked at me oddly and asked if I was tearing up, which necessitated me concoting some tale about scratching my eye.

Great. Now I’m that girl.

But seriously, this book is gorgeous. Hearbreaking. Wonderful. Winner of the 1921 Pulitzer prize. And also, its only like seven bucks at Barnes & Noble. Seriously–go read it.

***********

I only wrote 281 words today. Sad.

Day 1 and a Tidbit of Random

Well, it’s Day 1 of my 30 day write-every-day kick. For those of you who were expecting a post along the lines of “OMG all it took was a self-imposed deadline and I started doing 5,000 words a day!”, sorry. I’m good, but not that good.

However.

I did do 395 words, which is a bit above my rather measly goal of 250 words per day. Once you get started it really is much easier. And no, I am not upping the goal. That was another thing I promised myself. This is going to start out easy.

And since I don’t want to do 30 posts that are just “This is how many words I did today” each of these write-a-day posts will have what I ma terming Tidbits of Randomness! Today’s Tidbit of Randomness! is a few quotes from my quote book.

“Revenge is living well, without you.” ~Joyce Carol Oates

“Don’t go around saying the world owes you a living; the world owes you nothing, it was here first.” ~Mark Twain

“We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.” ~Oscar Wilde

“We are all a little weird and life’s a little weird, and when we find someone with weirdness compatible to ours, we join up in mutual weirdness and call it love.” ~Dr. Suess

That’s all for now, folks!

Addict

I realized today that I have devoured oner seventy issues of James Robinson’s Starman in slightly over ten days. And it’s not like it’s the most brilliant comic I’ve ever read (that probably goes to Batman: Year One or Supreme: The Return). I just had to finish it.

The same thing happened when I started watching The Office. It’s not one of my favorite TV shows. I don’t even find it all that funny. But somehow I watched all seven seasons in two weeks. While I was in school.

Books and I have a long and contentious relationship. I love them. I have had some book characters living inside my head for years (I’m talking to you, Leo). Others I have obsessed over and pulled apart until I feel like I’m going stir crazy inside the plots

On one hand, this is good. I wouldn’t be the person I am today without Sherlock Holmes (the books, my dear), Harry Potter, Captain Picard, Victor Frankenstein, and a host of other more obscure characters with me.

The first time I read Sherlock Holmes I was twelve, and it was a hot, sticky summer with nothing to do. It was the first summer where all we neighborhood kids felt too grown up and too pretentious to play the pickup capture-the-flag games that we used to. It was only a two-minute walk to the local elementary school and I used to go there and sit hunched over on a swing and read until my neck hurt from bending.

The copy I have was my mother’s, a complete set of all the Holmes tales. It’s about as thick as a brick, with onion-skin paper and gold writing on a black cover. It smells like dust, and back then I would have to switch hands every few minutes, from the heaviness. I always liked Watson a little better than Holmes, but then again I think we were meant to.

I can tell you all this about a book, and yet I can’t remember the first time I held my baby sister, although I know it must have been around the same time.

Not my drawing by the way. But squee-worthy.

And oh, how happy I was when I discovered fanfic. If you’ve ever been to Fanfiction.net you know the wealth of stories on that site, and how they could let a girl happily explore for months. And for months I did, delving into gen, slash, cross-overs, and every other geeky slang-tern you can imagine from fluff to lemon. There are very few things that compare to three hour chunks spent reading piles of Justice League and comic book and Sherlock Holmes fanfic. I’ve posted more comments using the word “squee” than I ever imagined I would. To date, I’ve contributed 100,000 words of my own. I find it soothing, friendly, and instantly gratifying. Also, a little shameful. Incidentally, this is about the mix of feelings I’ve heard alcoholics describe.

I alway have a book with me. I love them. I read under the table even though I know damn well that it would do me good to actually listen in Statistics for once. When things get awkward or when I just don’t know anyone I pull it out. My books are my security blanket.

Once, at the very end of tenth grade, a boy told me that I talk like a book.

I am quiet. I do not talk like a normal person. I like symbolism, and metaphors, and discussions about politics and religion. Sometimes, I think I would be better off as a girl who didn’t fall in love with Italo Calvino but who could comfortably have a conversation on the telephone.

The summer when I devoured Holmes, I devoured it because I had nothing else. The only two books in the house I hadn’t finished were it and Little Women, and the only thing Little Women ever taught me was what kind of girl I do not want to be. That was the summer when my mother refused to take me to the library. She said she was afraid I was addicted to books. I think what she thought was that by not letting me get new books she could break the cocoon of the imaginary world I’d built around myself, so I’d be the type of girl to smile at strangers and make friends with a handshake. My mother, you see, was not that type of girl either, though my sister was. I think she wanted to show me the easy path, and I also think she knew she would fail.

She was partially right in her fears. I have never had as many friends as my sister–the social butterfly and easy talker–but I have had better friends. Deeper ones. I have friends who I have known for a third of my life, who I can truly tell anything, and who trust me the same.

I don’t trust anyone who says they don’t read.

I do not talk easily, but I do it well. I can appear stony and cold, but I am not quick to anger or rashness. I am judgmental, I admit; I don’t like girls with high voices who giggle too loudly and think too little, but I know myself enough to choose my friends wisely. If I lose friends, it isn’t over fights or betrayal, we simply grow apart. I am smart. On the ACT I beat the boy who was three years ahead in math because there are two languages sections.

I am obsessive, but I am not alone in that. An addiction to language and words and imagination is certainly better than heroin or cocaine or vodka. I value my mind too much to lose it.

I would rather be this person than another. I would rather know what its like to roll lines of poetry around in my mouth like fine wine than give it up for comfort in crowds. I do not like people, at least not the sort of people who smile too easily and too often. This odd sense of humor I possess is better than being able to laugh at Will Ferrell. I’m the type of girl to smell old books and rub my hands across the leather, the type who collects ’50′s and ’60′s science fiction dime novels and stacks of comic books.

I like my life. I like being one of those odd little library girls. I am not the only one, I know. Perhaps this addiction of mine is not strictly healthy, but I would rather have it than not.

Comic Geekiness!

I am finally cured of my geek existential crisis, due to The Brave and the Bold, of all things.  It’s written by Mark Waid*, who I would gladly follow off a cliff so long as he left a trail of comic book pages, but holy cow, I laughed through this entire thing. No–not laughed, giggled. I, the cynical little nerdling, giggled throughout this book.

I don’t know what earns you a geek card more than giggling through a Catwoman/Superman team-up. Even Commissioner Gordon’s two-page appearance was wonderful, when he wondered aloud at a superhero who was actually polite.

Or finding 22 comics for a little over a buck apiece. Now that’s a good day.

Now I’m going to go try and read Alan Moore’s Promethea  again (last time I quite after the first volume), so let’s see how long this elation lasts.

*Seriously. My favorite comics writer like, ever.

 

Hate Poetry. But Read It.

There is a certain book from the library that I have checked out over ten times. It’s gotten to the point where I know my favorite parts and skip between them, rereading the lines that make me quiver in my chair and twist around in my head in the middle of the night.

No, it’s not a comic book, or Garcia-Marquez. It’s The Collected Poems of Phillip Larkin.

I don’t usually like poetry. I find Sylvia Plath whiny, Wordsworth annoyingly contradictory, and most other poems pretentious to the point of hypocrisy. But I adore Larkin.

He has a strange tension in his poems between religion and reason, and government and freedom, that pervade all of his works. Take, for instance, one of my favorites, “Observation”:

Only in books the flat and final happens,

Only in dreams we meet and interlock,

The hand impervious to nervous shock,

The future proofed against our vain suspense

Or from “Homage to a Government”:

Next year we shall be living in a country

That brought its soldiers home for lack of money.

The statutes will be standing in the same

Tree-muffled squares, and look nearly the same.

Our children will not know it’s a different country.

All we can hope to leave them now is money.

If that’s not enough, it may interest the comic-readers to know that Grant Morrison’s  nineties Batman masterpiece Arkham Asylum: A Serious House on Serious Earth got its title (the serious house part) from a line of Larkin’s poetry. Originally it referred to a church.

Poetry teaches about sound better than any novel. The way a poet makes the syllables fit together so no line stumbles, but rolls off the tongue to be happy or sad or elevated through just the tone of them. Literary fiction people know how to use this–but any book could.

So here is my plea to fictioneers–go read poetry. Lots of it. Find the ones you like and take them apart. It’ll make you better.